home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: dimensional.com!not-for-mail
- From: musashi@dimensional.com (Harry Langford)
- Newsgroups: alt.computer.consultants,comp.edu,comp.lang.basic.misc,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.misc,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.programming
- Subject: Re: Info on being a Systems Programmer/Analyst?
- Followup-To: alt.computer.consultants,comp.edu,comp.lang.basic.misc,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.misc,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.programming
- Date: 26 Mar 1996 21:29:53 GMT
- Organization: Dimensional Communications
- Message-ID: <4j9nkh$4qv@nova.dimensional.com>
- References: <3150eada.14098156@News.why.net> <4j7m18$6d3@shelby.visix.com> <4j975b$3sd@scoop.eco.twg.com> <4j9hsv$3so8@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: blackhole.dimensional.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- tnagy@ibm.net wrote:
- : >
- : >I'd say that knowing at least two completely different assembly languages
- : >well enough to be able write simple programs in them is essential if you
- : >want to earn a living as a programmer, even if you never use assembler
- : >again.
- :
- : Finally something we agree on 100%...
-
-
- Well, I wasn't going to post anything, but now that I
- see TWO dubious replies...
-
- Please see header - "Systems Programmer/Analyst".
-
- Having HAD two assembler classes, I can say that in my
- current ANALYST position, they are worthless. Set theory,
- algebra, abstract algorithms and just plain business classes
- like accounting and economics are more important. By far.
-
- Of course, assembly IS important if you're just a coder.
-